golden principles of circumstantial evidence
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
In “Sharad Birdichand
Sarda vs State of Maharashtra”:AIR 1984 SC-1622,the SC elaborated the five golden principles of circumstantial
evidence laid down in Hanumant Vs.State of MP:AIR 1952 SC-343 which has
been strictly abided by the SC itself in various leading cases and therefore
are very important.
1. The
circumstances from which the conclusion of guilt is to be drawn should be fully
established.
2.
The facts so established should be
consistent with the hypothesis of guilt.
3.
The circumstances should be of a
conclusive nature and tendency.
4.
They should exlcude every possible
hypothesis except the one to be proved.
5. There
must be a chain of evidence so complete as not to leave any reasonable ground
for the conclusion consistent with the innocence of the accused and must show
that in all human probability the act must have been done by the accussed.
These five golden principles constitute the panchsheel of the
proof oa case based on circumstantial evidence and in the absence of a corpus
deliciti.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Comments
Post a Comment