Execution Proceedings (Ss.47, 60, 122 Or.21 Rs.11, 98 & Or.11 R.14):- Executive Proceedings-Executing court must dispose of executive proceedings within six months from date of filing which may be extended only by recording reasons in writing for such delay. This would mean that every effort should be made to dispose of execution petition within said time-limit and executing court should have reasons for not being able to dispose of execution petition. Executing court is duty-bound to record reasons in writing when it is unable to dispose of matter within six months (Bhoj Raj Garg vs Goyal Education & Welfare Society: (2025) 9 SCC-618.
Essential Characteristics of a Will:-
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Essential
Characteristics of a Will:-
1. There
must be a legal declaration;
2.
Such declaration must be with respect to
the property of the testator &
3. The
declaration must be intended to operate after the death of the testator.
Criteria
for Proper Execution of Will:-
1. The
testator must have a disposing mind free from all extraneous influences with
sound mental mind;
2.
The testator must have a mental capacity
to make a valid will until contrary is proved;
3.
The Will should be executed in
accordance with S.63 ISA read with Ss.67/68 of IEA;
4.
The onus of proof of the Will is on the
propounder of the Will.
5. If
any suspicious circumstances arises,required to be removed by the propounder
etc.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Popular posts from this blog
golden principles of circumstantial evidence
In “ Sharad Birdichand Sarda vs State of Maharashtra” :AIR 1984 SC-1622,the SC elaborated the five golden principles of circumstantial evidence laid down in Hanumant Vs.State of MP:AIR 1952 SC-343 which has been strictly abided by the SC itself in various leading cases and therefore are very important. 1. The circumstances from which the conclusion of guilt is to be drawn should be fully established. 2. The facts so established should be consistent with the hypothesis of guilt. 3. The circumstances should be of a conclusive nature and tendency. 4. They should exlcude every possible hypothesis except the one to be proved. 5. There must be a chain of evidence so complete as not to leave any reasonable ground for the conclusion consistent with the innocence of the accused and must show that...
Scientific and Legal Dimensions of DNA Technology:-
Scientific and Legal Dimensions of DNA Technology DNA fingerprinting, profiling, or typing is widely considered the most significant contribution of science and technology in the twentieth century. This breakthrough is anticipated to become the universal identification technique of the twenty-first century. This emerging methodology has completely revolutionized the entire world by distinguishing every individual from another. Consequently, it plays a momentous role in both criminal and civil justice delivery systems today. It serves as an invaluable tool for the accurate identification of ancient or fragmented skeletal remains. Medical professionals also rely heavily on this technology for the detection of early onset diseases. Furthermore, it allows for the proactive mapping and diagnosis of various severe inherited disorders. This high-utility identification power stems directly from the biological blueprint fo...
Applicability of CPC & Limitation Act in Writ Proceedings:-
Applicability of CPC & Limitation Act in Writ Proceedings:- The issue concerning applicability of the provisions of the CPC in the writ proceedings is no longer res integra in view clear pronouncement made by the Supreme Court in “ Puran Singh and Others v State of Punjab and Others” reported in (1996) 2 SCC-205 , wherein the Supreme Court was dealing with an issue as to whether the provisions contained under Order 22 of the CPC are applicable to proceedings under Article 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India. The question as to whether provisions of the Act, 1963 would apply in proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is also no longer res integra in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in “Smt. Sudama Devi v Commissioner and others ” reported in (1983) 2 SCC-1.
Comments
Post a Comment